On 06/12/2017 11:42 AM, Jerome Brunet wrote:

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 11:49 +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:

quoted

Switch to the stable UART bindings by adding a XTAL node and using the
proper compatible strings.

Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <redacted>

Shouldn't this patch be squashed with patch 4 ?

Yep, so it doesn't break bisect.

Neil

quoted

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi
index b0fc91f..a334fbe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi

@@ -70,9 +70,37 @@
 		};
 	};
 
+	xtal: xtal-clk {
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+		clock-output-names = "xtal";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
 	clk81: clk at 0 {
 		#clock-cells = <0>;
 		compatible = "fixed-clock";
 		clock-frequency = <200000000>;
 	};
 }; /* end of / */
+
+
+&uart_AO {
+	clocks = <&xtal>, <&clk81>, <&clk81>;
+	clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
+};
+
+&uart_A {
+	clocks = <&xtal>, <&clk81>, <&clk81>;
+	clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
+};
+
+&uart_B {
+	clocks = <&xtal>, <&clk81>, <&clk81>;
+	clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
+};
+
+&uart_C {
+	clocks = <&xtal>, <&clk81>, <&clk81>;
+	clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
+};