Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 4 authors, 2017-06-12

[PATCH v4 2/7] tty/serial: meson_uart: update to stable bindings

From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
Date: 2017-06-12 09:39:10
Also in: linux-amlogic, linux-serial, lkml

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 11:49 +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Helmut Klein <redacted>

This patch handle the stable UART bindings but also keeps compatibility
with the legacy non-stable bindings until all boards uses them.

Signed-off-by: Helmut Klein <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <redacted>
---
?drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---
?1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
index 60f1679..d2c8136 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
@@ -579,8 +579,12 @@ static void meson_serial_early_console_write(struct
console *co,
?	device->con->write = meson_serial_early_console_write;
?	return 0;
?}
+/* Legacy bindings, should be removed when no more used */
?OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE(meson, "amlogic,meson-uart",
?		????meson_serial_early_console_setup);
+/* Stable bindings */
+OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE(meson, "amlogic,meson-ao-uart",
+		????meson_serial_early_console_setup);
?
?#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE	(&meson_serial_console)
?#else
@@ -595,11 +599,95 @@ static void meson_serial_early_console_write(struct
console *co,
?	.cons		= MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE,
?};
?
+/*
+ * This function gets clocks in the legacy non-stable DT bindings.
+ * This code will be remove once all the platforms switch to the
+ * new DT bindings.
+ */
+static int meson_uart_probe_clocks_legacy(struct platform_device *pdev,
+					??struct uart_port *port)
+{
+	struct clk *clk = NULL;
+	int ret;
+
+	clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk);
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't enable clk\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
+			(void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
+			clk);
+
+	port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				???struct uart_port *port)
+{
+	struct clk *clk_xtal = NULL;
+	struct clk *clk_pclk = NULL;
+	struct clk *clk_baud = NULL;
+	int ret;
+
+	clk_pclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pclk");
+	if (IS_ERR(clk_pclk))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk_pclk);
+
+	clk_xtal = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "xtal");
+	if (IS_ERR(clk_xtal))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk_xtal);
+
+	clk_baud = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "baud");
+	if (IS_ERR(clk_xtal))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk_pclk);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't enable pclk\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
+			(void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
+			clk_pclk);
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk_xtal);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't enable xtal\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
+			(void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
+			clk_xtal);
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk_baud);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't enable baud clk\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
+			(void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
+			clk_baud);
It's not critical but there is a lot of duplication here. Should we add an
helper function doing "get, prepare_enable, add_reset_action" with the clock
name as argument ?

Apart from this:

Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
+
+	port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk_baud);
This was already like this, but I wonder if we should store the *clk instead of
caching the rate. Then call get_rate when appropriate

Could be done in separate patch.

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
?static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
?{
?	struct resource *res_mem, *res_irq;
?	struct uart_port *port;
-	struct clk *clk;
?	int ret = 0;
?
?	if (pdev->dev.of_node)
@@ -625,11 +713,15 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
?	if (!port)
?		return -ENOMEM;
?
-	clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
-	if (IS_ERR(clk))
-		return PTR_ERR(clk);
+	/* Use legacy way until all platforms switch to new bindings */
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "amlogic,meson-uart"))
+		ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks_legacy(pdev, port);
+	else
+		ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(pdev, port);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
?
-	port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk);
?	port->iotype = UPIO_MEM;
?	port->mapbase = res_mem->start;
?	port->irq = res_irq->start;
@@ -668,9 +760,14 @@ static int meson_uart_remove(struct platform_device
*pdev)
?	return 0;
?}
?
-
?static const struct of_device_id meson_uart_dt_match[] = {
+	/* Legacy bindings, should be removed when no more used */
?	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-uart" },
+	/* Stable bindings */
+	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart" },
+	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart" },
+	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart" },
+	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart" },
?	{ /* sentinel */ },
?};
?MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_uart_dt_match);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help