[PATCH 4/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Add driver for A83T CCU
From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2017-04-03 07:54:08
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:53:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
quoted
quoted
To me it seems the "factors" bits are mostly the same. Differences are mostly with parent-specific pre-dividers, clock post-dividers, and non-standard factors. The first is nicely handled by the new mux wrapper, the second is currently only used with NK types, and the last is currently only supported by single factor divider or multiplier clocks with tables. Non-standard factors are probably the trickiest one, but given we will support full factor tables for some of the tricky CPU PLLs, this is probably solved, even if not implemented yet. I'll start with the NP style clocks, which only use P when the output is under a certain frequency.Do we need to use a P factor? I mean, we can just create a custom clock for that, I'd realy don't want to cripple the generic code for a completely non-generic problem.I'm not sure. AFAIK the vendor BSP cpufreq doesn't use frequencies low enough to require the P divider, so we could just ignore it. But then we need to make sure it's set to 1 at probe time, while keeping the output frequency usable, which would kind of bloat the probe function. FYI I'm in favor of doing it this way.
Hmmm, I don't know why I replied that anymore, I thought you were still talking about MMC, while you were clearly talking about CPU_PLLs... The question still remains though. If we're not using P yet, and if the BSP doesn't either, then we can just hardcode it. We can always come up with something later if we need to use it, either an NP-class, or a table. The only thing we need to care about would be to pay attention to what the P factor already is, before forcing it to 1. If it's set to 4, that would mean multiplying the CPU clock by 4, which is probably not such a great idea. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170403/59f79643/attachment-0001.sig>