On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 10:34 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Joel Stanley [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

In the future I think we should send fixes separately from the rest of
the series, so it's clear to Linus where we expect patches to end up.

Perhaps Linus can share his preference with us?

Just make it clear to me where the patch is headed, if it is
a fix or a new feature.

Also mixing stuff in big series is of course problematic because
all the CC:in on MFD patches and whatnot that I don't apply
makes the picture blurry, but sometimes it is anyways needed
for context so it is a soft requirement.

Context was my concern here and I would otherwise have split the rest
of the patches along mfd/pinctrl boundaries. I felt the situation was
odd enough to warrant presenting the full picture.

Andrew

Yours,
Linus Walleij

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20161108/472a2ae8/attachment.sig>