Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2016-11-22

[PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl-aspeed-g5: Never set SCU90[6]

From: joel@jms.id.au (Joel Stanley)
Date: 2016-11-03 22:59:57
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Andrew Jeffery [off-list ref] wrote:
If a pin depending on bit 6 in SCU90 is requested for GPIO, the export
will succeed but changes to the GPIO's value will not be accepted by the
hardware. This is because the pinmux driver has misconfigured the SCU by
writing 1 to the reserved bit.

The description of SCU90[6] from the datasheet is 'Reserved, must keep
at value ?0?'. The fix is to switch pinmux from the bit-flipping macro
to explicitly configuring the .enable and .disable values to zero.

The patch has been tested on an AST2500 EVB.

Fixes: 56e57cb6c07f (pinctrl: Add pinctrl-aspeed-g5 driver)
Reported-by: Uma Yadlapati <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>

And tested-by.
This patch should be applied for 4.9.
In the future I think we should send fixes separately from the rest of
the series, so it's clear to Linus where we expect patches to end up.

Perhaps Linus can share his preference with us?

Cheers,

Joel

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
index c8c72e8259d3..87b46390b695 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@

 #define ASPEED_G5_NR_PINS 228

-#define COND1          SIG_DESC_BIT(SCU90, 6, 0)
+#define COND1          { SCU90, BIT(6), 0, 0 }
 #define COND2          { SCU94, GENMASK(1, 0), 0, 0 }

 #define B14 0
--
2.7.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help