Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 6 authors, 2016-11-11

[PATCH v14 7/9] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Refactor the timer init code to prepare for GTDT

From: Fu Wei <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-26 15:24:38
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml

Hi Mark,

On 21 October 2016 at 19:32, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:15AM +0800, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
quoted
From: Fu Wei <redacted>

The patch refactor original memory-mapped timer init code:
(1) extract some subfunction for reusing some common code
    a. get_cnttidr
    b. is_best_frame
(2) move base address and irq code for arch_timer_mem to
arch_timer_mem_register

Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <redacted>
---
 drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index c7b0040..e78095f 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
 static unsigned arch_timers_present __initdata;

 static void __iomem *arch_counter_base;
+static void __iomem *cntctlbase __initdata;

 struct arch_timer {
      void __iomem *base;
@@ -656,15 +657,49 @@ out:
      return err;
 }

-static int __init arch_timer_mem_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq)
+static int __init arch_timer_mem_register(struct device_node *np, void *frame)
 {
-     int ret;
-     irq_handler_t func;
+     struct device_node *frame_node = NULL;
      struct arch_timer *t;
+     void __iomem *base;
+     irq_handler_t func;
+     unsigned int irq;
+     int ret;
+
+     if (!frame)
+             return -EINVAL;
Why would we call this without a frame?
Sorry, I just verify it , make sure frame is not NULL,
Because it is a "static" function, so we do need this check?
quoted
+
+     if (np) {
... or without a node?
For "np", for now, we just  just verify it, but it is just paperation
for GTDT support,
Because in next patch, if np == NULL, that means we call this function
from GTDT, but not DT.
quoted
+             frame_node = (struct device_node *)frame;
+             base = of_iomap(frame_node, 0);
+             arch_timer_detect_rate(base, np);
... BANG! (we check base too late, below).

Please as Marc requested several versions ago: split the FW parsing
(ACPI and DT) so that happens first, *then* once we have the data in a
common format, use that to drive poking the HW, requesting IRQs, etc,
completely independent of the source.

In patches, do this by:

(1) adding the data structures
(2) splitting the existing DT probing to use them
(3) Adding ACPI functionality atop
this patch is a preparation for GTDT support, I have splitted some
functions for reusing them in next patch(GTDT support)

if np == NULL, that means we call this function from GTDT, but
if np != NULL, that means we call this function from DT

quoted
-static int __init arch_timer_mem_init(struct device_node *np)
+static int __init get_cnttidr(struct device_node *np, u32 *cnttidr)
 {
-     struct device_node *frame, *best_frame = NULL;
-     void __iomem *cntctlbase, *base;
-     unsigned int irq, ret = -EINVAL;
-     u32 cnttidr;
+     if (!cnttidr)
+             return -EINVAL;
+
+     if (np)
+             cntctlbase = of_iomap(np, 0);
+     else
+             return -EINVAL;
We want to check this for ACPI too, no?
just like I said above, this is a preparation for GTDT support,

So please correct me if I am doing this in the wrong way, thanks :-)
Thanks,
Mark.


-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help