[PATCH v14 3/9] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Improve printk relevant code
From: Fu Wei <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-26 08:28:47
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml
Hi Mark, On 20 October 2016 at 23:32, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:11AM +0800, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:quoted
static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type) { - pr_info("Architected %s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n", - type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? "cp15" : "", - type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? " and " : "", - type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? "mmio" : "", - (unsigned long)arch_timer_rate / 1000000, - (unsigned long)(arch_timer_rate / 10000) % 100, - type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? - (arch_timer_uses_ppi == VIRT_PPI) ? "virt" : "phys" : - "", - type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? "/" : "", - type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? - arch_timer_mem_use_virtual ? "virt" : "phys" : - ""); + pr_info("%s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n", + type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? "cp15" : "", + type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? " and " : "", + type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? "mmio" : "", + (unsigned long)arch_timer_rate / 1000000, + (unsigned long)(arch_timer_rate / 10000) % 100, + type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? + (arch_timer_uses_ppi == VIRT_PPI) ? "virt" : "phys" : + "",Please restore the additional indent on this line...quoted
+ type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? "/" : "", + type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? + arch_timer_mem_use_virtual ? "virt" : "phys" : + "");... and these two. No matter what checkpatch says, I prefer the code that way so as to keep the ternary clear.
yes, NP, I have fixed it :-)
[...]quoted
@@ -768,7 +769,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_init(void) return ret; arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[VIRT_PPI]; - +Please mention the whitespace fixup in the commit message. It's surprising otherwise.
OK, added this message.
With all that: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Great thanks :-)
Thanks, Mark.
-- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat