[PATCH v7 12/14] arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must bind to node0
From: Leizhen ThunderTown <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-29 06:57:22
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 2016/8/26 23:49, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:51PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:quoted
1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not been initialized.
This description refer to below: - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) - set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE); 1. When the above code is executed, only the bit of cpu0 was set on cpu_possible_mask. So that, only set_cpu_numa_node(0, NUMA_NO_NODE); will be executed. 2. set_cpu_numa_node will access percpu variable numa_node, but setup_per_cpu_areas is called after current time. Without the first problem, it will lead kernel crash. I changed the title of this patch in v7, the original is "remove some useless code". I think I should separate this into a new patch.
quoted
2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0.Whilst I suspect you're using enumerated lists in order to try to make things clearer, I'm having a really hard time understanding the commit messages you have in this series. It's actually much better if you structure them as concise paragraphs explaining: - What is the problem that you're fixing? - How does that problem manifest? - How does the patch fix it? As far as I can see, this patch just removes a bunch of code with no explanation as to why it's not required or any problems caused by keeping it around. Willquoted
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <redacted> --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c index 114180f..07a1978 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu) */ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) { - unsigned int cpu; int node; /* setup nr_node_ids if not done yet */@@ -107,9 +106,6 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) cpumask_clear(node_to_cpumask_map[node]); } - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) - set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE); - /* cpumask_of_node() will now work */ pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids); }@@ -119,13 +115,13 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) */ void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { - map_cpu_to_node(cpu, numa_off ? 0 : cpu_to_node_map[cpu]); + map_cpu_to_node(cpu, cpu_to_node_map[cpu]); } void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { /* fallback to node 0 */ - if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) + if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || numa_off) nid = 0;
After the below code have been removed, we should make the corresponding adjustment. otherwise, kernel will be crashed if "numa=off" was set in bootargs.
quoted
cpu_to_node_map[cpu] = nid;@@ -375,10 +371,6 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) setup_node_to_cpumask_map(); - /* init boot processor */ - cpu_to_node_map[0] = 0; - map_cpu_to_node(0, 0);
These code limit cpu0 must belong to node0, but our current implementation deesn't have this limitation.
quoted
- return 0; } -- 2.5.0.