On 2016/8/26 20:39, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:42PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
quoted
Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <redacted>
---
drivers/of/of_numa.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
The subject has arm64/numa, but this is clearly core OF code and
I originally added below check in arch/arm64/mm/numa.c, until Hanjun Guo
told me that it should move into drivers/of/of_numa.c
I forgot updating this.
requires an ack from Rob.
The commit message also doesn't make much sense to me.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
index 7b3fbdc..afaeb9c 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
*/
continue;
+ if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
Do you really want to return from the function here? Shouldn't we at least
of_node_put(np), i.e. by using a break; ?
Thanks for pointing out this mistake. I will change to "r = -EINVAL" in the next version.
Will
.