[RFC PATCH v2 0/9] scpi: Add SCPI registry to handle legacy protocol
From: Frank Wang <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-22 03:02:17
Also in:
linux-amlogic, lkml
Hi Neil, On 2016/6/21 18:02, Neil Armstrong wrote:
This patchset aims to support the legacy SCPI firmware implementation that was delivered as early technology preview for the JUNO platform. Finally a stable, maintained and public implementation for the SCPI protocol has been upstreamed part of the JUNO support and it is the recommended way of implementing SCP communication on ARMv8 platforms. The Amlogic GXBB platform is using this legacy protocol, as the RK3368 & RK3399 platforms. Only the GXBB example is provided here, but it's unclear if other Amlogic ARMv8 based SoCs uses this legacy procotol. In order to support the legacy protocol : - Move the scpi_get_ops to a thin registry layer - Change the arm_scpi.c to use the registry layer - Add a separate config option to build the registry layer - Add the legacy SCPI driver based on the new implementation - For example, add the Amlogic GXBB MHU and SCPI DT cpufreq & sensors nodes
Two comments may be not very associated with this series. First, do you have any plan to implement the APIs for extended set ID of SCPI? If these APIs do not care commands, just focus on a message transmission access, something like a library role, and extended command can define in consumers driver module, I think it can more help for other consumers like Rockchip to send/receive nonstandard command data conveniently. Can it be? Second, As far as I know, some legacy mailbox hardware which like Altera, Rockchip... need write command and data register sequentially, then it can create a interrupt, however, arm-scpi first use inner scpi_xfer structure to package the message, then data is passed to msg_submit (At mailbox.c), further into the bottom mailbox driver, but the data type is converted void*, so the mailbox driver could not extract the contents of message, if it do cast type, it may become non-general from driver view. Hence, is it possible to add a message header into scpi_xfer which for the bottom mailbox driver or dope out any other methods to solve it? BR. Frank
Initial RFC discution tread can be found at https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/26/111 Neil Armstrong (9): mailbox: Add Amlogic Meson Message-Handling-Unit dt-bindings: mailbox: Add Amlogic Meson MHU Bindings ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb: Add Meson MHU Node firmware: Add a SCPI registry to handle multiple implementations firmware: scpi: Switch arm_scpi to use new registry firmware: Add legacy SCPI protocol driver dt-bindings: arm: Update arm,scpi bindings with Meson GXBB SCPI ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb: Add SRAM node ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb: Add SCPI with cpufreq & sensors Nodes Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 8 +- .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/meson-mhu.txt | 33 ++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi | 53 ++ drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 24 + drivers/firmware/Makefile | 2 + drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 14 +- drivers/firmware/legacy_scpi.c | 644 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/firmware/scpi.c | 94 +++ drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 + drivers/mailbox/meson_mhu.c | 199 +++++++ include/linux/scpi_protocol.h | 15 +- 11 files changed, 1075 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/meson-mhu.txt create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/legacy_scpi.c create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/scpi.c create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/meson_mhu.c