On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:

quoted

If there are never going to be any new users why bother at all, why
would anyone paste it in when all the SoCs that ever use this are
already upstream?

Generally if I come across documentation which is incorrect, I like to fix it.

A lot of this is details of the system integration for this SoC, not
actual errors.

Currently the DT ASoC documentation doesn't match the driver and the example
doesn't work, which is not ideal. I could well be the last person who needs
to read it & use the example, but deliberately leaving it with mistakes in
seemed like a bad idea.

People might end up trying to use it as an example, it's fairly routine
to have to explain to people that just because some old driver did
something that doesn't mean it's something we want in new drivers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160426/7531f543/attachment.sig>