[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-11 16:04:11
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-omap
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-11 16:04:11
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-omap
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:
The single pinmux controller can be cascaded to the other interrupt controllers. Hence when propagating wake-up settings to its parent interrupt controller, there's possiblity of detecting possible recursive locking and getting lockdep warning. This patch avoids this false positive by using a separate lockdep class for this single pinctrl interrupts. Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted> Cc: linux-gpio at vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
Patch applied with Grygorii's review tag. Yours, Linus Walleij