Hi Linus,

On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

   pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
   pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
   ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag

  arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c        |  4 ++--
  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c     |  9 ++++-----
  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c |  1 +
  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++---

Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently
of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this?

Thanks for the follow up.
IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be
merged together(at-least for bisectibility)

If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony?

I think so.

Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know.

Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a
test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep