Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:

The single pinmux controller can be cascaded to the other interrupt
controllers. Hence when propagating wake-up settings to its parent
interrupt controller, there's possiblity of detecting possible recursive
locking and getting lockdep warning.

This patch avoids this false positive by using a separate lockdep class
for this single pinctrl interrupts.

Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>

Patch applied with Grygorii's review tag.

Yours,
Linus Walleij