On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:26:05AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:11:52 +0100
Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

However, I'd like to keep per-soc and per-clocks compatibles in the
DT, in case we need to protect a clock in the future.

What do you mean by "protect a clock"?

Prevent it from shutting down.

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160209/4fa6d3c3/attachment.sig>