[PATCH v2 04/10] doc/bindings: Update PCIe devicetree binding documentation for LS2080A
From: Lian M.H. <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-06 02:25:46
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree
Hi Bhupesh I agree with Leo whose suggestion is a better. Thanks, Minghuan
-----Original Message----- From: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370 Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 4:20 AM To: Leo Li <redacted>; Lian Minghuan-B31939 [off-list ref] Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; Catalin.Marinas at arm.com; will.deacon at arm.com; olof at lixom.net; Bhupesh SHARMA [off-list ref]; devicetree at vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 04/10] doc/bindings: Update PCIe devicetree binding documentation for LS2080Aquoted
From: Leo Li [mailto:pku.leo at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 11:27 PM On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Bhupesh Sharma [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add the documentation for compatible string "fsl,ls2080a-pcie" for Freescale's LS2080A platform. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <redacted> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt index 6286f04..e72e68f 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ This PCIe host controller is based on the SynopsisDesignware PCIe IP and thus inherits all the common properties definedin designware-pcie.txt.quoted
Required properties: -- compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as"fsl,ls1021a-pcie"quoted
+- compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as +"fsl,ls1021a-pcie", + "fsl,ls2080a-pcie".Make it generic like "fsl,<chip>-pcie"Minghuan, if you don't have an objection, I would like to address Leo's suggestion in v3 of this series as I think it is a valid one. Please share your views. Regards, Bhupesh