On 2015?09?24? 11:04, Xing Zheng wrote:

quoted

quoted

  #define RK3066_PLL_RATE(_rate, _nr, _nf, _no)    \

@@ -95,12 +106,31 @@ enum rockchip_pll_type {
      .nb = _nb,                        \
  }

+#define RK3036_PLL_RATE(_rate, _refdiv, _fbdiv, _postdiv1,    \
+            _postdiv2, _dsmpd, _frac)        \
+{                                \
+    .rate    = _rate##U,                    \
+    .fbdiv = _fbdiv,                    \
+    .postdiv1 = _postdiv1,                    \
+    .refdiv = _refdiv,                    \
+    .postdiv2 = _postdiv2,                    \
+    .dsmpd = _dsmpd,                    \
+    .frac = _frac,                        \
+}
+
  struct rockchip_pll_rate_table {
      unsigned long rate;
      unsigned int nr;
      unsigned int nf;
      unsigned int no;
      unsigned int nb;
+    /* for RK3036 */
+    unsigned int fbdiv;
+    unsigned int postdiv1;
+    unsigned int refdiv;
+    unsigned int postdiv2;
+    unsigned int dsmpd;
+    unsigned int frac;

same for these 2 ... should be part of the pll addition itself

  };
Done.

Sorry, I have one question:
The "struct rockchip_pll_rate_table" is called in "rockchip/clk-pll.c" 
on many functions, I think I could add a struct like:
struct rk3036_pll_rate_table {
     unsigned int fbdiv;
     unsigned int postdiv1;
     unsigned int refdiv;
     unsigned int postdiv2;
     unsigned int dsmpd;
     unsigned int frac;
};
but, it will add many redundancy codes in "rockchip/clk-pll.c" just for 
call "struct rk3036_pll_rate_table".

Thanks.