On 12-08-15, 10:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

Possibly, had the code previously been like that.  See:

commit 2479bb6443d6a793f896219a34bfab0cc410f0b4
Author: Viresh Kumar [off-list ref]
Date:   Thu Dec 4 09:42:04 2014 +0530

which post-dates this patch, and removes this "style" in favour of using
the broken list mechanism.

Just to make sure I understand it properly, do you want to say that I
added 2479bb6 patch after you reported this problem & your patch?

If yes, then I don't see how my patch came after yours. Mine was
written on 4/Dec/2014 and committed on 8/Dec/2014 and you first
reported the problem on 14/Dec/2014.

Frankly... you don't have a leg to stand on

I can accept that :)

because _you_ knew about this problem, and you saw my patch.  So removing
something that my patch to fix a serious bug relied upon...

I don't think I removed that stuff after your patch.

You know what?  At this point, I'm just not going to bother.  You fix
this lockdep problem, I'm obviously useless at kernel stuff.

Okay, leave it on me. I will re-circulate your patch.

-- 
viresh