3.18: lockdep problems in cpufreq
From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin)
Date: 2015-08-18 02:30:57
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin)
Date: 2015-08-18 02:30:57
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
Hi there, On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote: <cut>
Well, that's the situation as per MAINTAINERS today. You seem to be concerned that it may not reflect the reality, but in that case I can only recommend sending a patch against MAINTAINERS to remove Eduardo from there.quoted
As I've said, I'm not bothering with this anymore, it's just far too much effort to play these stupid games.I'm not sure what you mean by "these stupid games" here.quoted
The deadlock can stay for all I care.Fair enough.
I applied the patch. And it has generated the conflict in linux-next, as was mentioned in this thread. I already sent the pull request. Yes, I missed the thread. Apologize for this and for the inconvenience I have caused. The deadlock will be taken care using Russel's patch. Thanks Viresh for notifying me.
Thanks, Rafael
BR, -- Eduardo Bezerra Valentin