On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 03/12/15 10:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
quoted
On 2015-02-17 14:01:04 [-0800], Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
diff =
--- arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ /tmp/cocci-output-11792-b62223-mach-imx6q.c
@@ -211,7 +211,6 @@ static void __init imx6q_1588_init(void)
* set bit IOMUXC_GPR1[21]. Or the PTP clock must be from pad
* (external OSC), and we need to clear the bit.
*/
- clksel = ptp_clk == enet_ref ? IMX6Q_GPR1_ENET_CLK_SEL_ANATOP :
IMX6Q_GPR1_ENET_CLK_SEL_PAD;
gpr = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,imx6q-iomuxc-gpr");
if (!IS_ERR(gpr))
Any idea how to do the comparison here? Or should we rely that the bootloader
sets this properly (it managed already to select a frequency)? The phy has no
clock node in current DT's so we can check this.
This has been fixed by adding a clk_is_match() helper and using that to
compare instead of comparing raw pointers. It would be nice if we could
replace the patch with something else that doesn't require this helper
though. It looks like this is static board configuration, so I wonder
why we didn't just have a DT property that indicates how the gpr should
be configured for this particular board.
We did not add a DT property for it, because there was already enough
info (clock configuration) in DT for kernel to figure it out.
Shawn