[PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-06 13:39:45
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:35:28PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 02/05/15 16:42, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:14:01PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
Actually we can bury the __clk_create_clk() inside __of_clk_get_from_provider(). We should also move __clk_get() into there because right now we have a hole where whoever calls of_clk_get_from_provider() never calls __clk_get() on the clk, leading to possible badness. v2 coming soon.There's some other issues here too... sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c: priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, np ? "internal" : NULL); ... priv->extclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "extclk"); if (IS_ERR(priv->extclk)) { ... } else { if (priv->extclk == priv->clk) { devm_clk_put(&pdev->dev, priv->extclk); priv->extclk = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } else { dev_info(&pdev->dev, "found external clock\n"); clk_prepare_enable(priv->extclk); soc_dai = kirkwood_i2s_dai_extclk; } It should be fine provided your "trick" is only done for DT clocks, but not for legacy - with legacy, a NULL in the clkdev tables will match both these requests, hence the need to compare the clk_get() return value to tell whether we get the same clock.Are we still talking about of_clk_get_from_provider()? Or are we talking about comparing struct clk pointers?
Comparing struct clk pointers, and the implications of the patch changing the clk_get() et.al. to be unique struct clk pointers.
From what I can tell this code is now broken because we made all clk getting functions (there's quite a few...) return unique pointers every time they're called. It seems that the driver wants to know if extclk and clk are the same so it can do something differently in kirkwood_set_rate(). Do we need some sort of clk_equal(struct clk *a, struct clk *b) function for drivers like this?
Well, the clocks in question are the SoC internal clock (which is more or less fixed, but has a programmable divider) and an externally supplied clock, and the IP has a multiplexer on its input which allows us to select between those two sources. If it were possible to bind both to the same clock, it wouldn't be a useful configuration - nothing would be gained from doing so in terms of available rates. What the comparison is there for is to catch the case with legacy lookups where a clkdev lookup entry with a NULL connection ID results in matching any connection ID passed to clk_get(). If the patch changes this, then we will have a regression - and this is something which needs fixing _before_ we do this "return unique clocks". -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.