Thread (46 messages) read the whole thread 46 messages, 11 authors, 2015-03-13

[PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-06 13:39:45
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:35:28PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 02/05/15 16:42, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:14:01PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
Actually we can bury the __clk_create_clk() inside
__of_clk_get_from_provider(). We should also move __clk_get() into there
because right now we have a hole where whoever calls
of_clk_get_from_provider() never calls __clk_get() on the clk, leading
to possible badness. v2 coming soon.
There's some other issues here too...

sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c:

        priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, np ? "internal" : NULL);
...
        priv->extclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "extclk");
        if (IS_ERR(priv->extclk)) {
...
	} else {
                if (priv->extclk == priv->clk) {
                        devm_clk_put(&pdev->dev, priv->extclk);
                        priv->extclk = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
                } else {
                        dev_info(&pdev->dev, "found external clock\n");
                        clk_prepare_enable(priv->extclk);
                        soc_dai = kirkwood_i2s_dai_extclk;
                }

It should be fine provided your "trick" is only done for DT clocks,
but not for legacy - with legacy, a NULL in the clkdev tables will
match both these requests, hence the need to compare the clk_get()
return value to tell whether we get the same clock.
Are we still talking about of_clk_get_from_provider()? Or are we talking
about comparing struct clk pointers?
Comparing struct clk pointers, and the implications of the patch changing
the clk_get() et.al. to be unique struct clk pointers.
From what I can tell this code is
now broken because we made all clk getting functions (there's quite a
few...) return unique pointers every time they're called. It seems that
the driver wants to know if extclk and clk are the same so it can do
something differently in kirkwood_set_rate(). Do we need some sort of
clk_equal(struct clk *a, struct clk *b) function for drivers like this?
Well, the clocks in question are the SoC internal clock (which is more or
less fixed, but has a programmable divider) and an externally supplied
clock, and the IP has a multiplexer on its input which allows us to select
between those two sources.

If it were possible to bind both to the same clock, it wouldn't be a
useful configuration - nothing would be gained from doing so in terms of
available rates.

What the comparison is there for is to catch the case with legacy lookups
where a clkdev lookup entry with a NULL connection ID results in matching
any connection ID passed to clk_get().  If the patch changes this, then
we will have a regression - and this is something which needs fixing
_before_ we do this "return unique clocks".

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help