[PATCH 7/7] can: m_can: workaround for transmit data less than 4 bytes
From: socketcan@hartkopp.net (Oliver Hartkopp)
Date: 2014-11-04 13:13:30
Also in:
linux-can, netdev
On 04.11.2014 11:33, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 11/04/2014 10:27 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
quoted
+ /* We meet an IC issue that we have to write the full 8At least on the *insert SoC name here*, an issue with the Message RAM was discovered. Sending CAN frames with dlc less than 4 bytes will lead to bit errors, when the first 8 bytes of the Message RAM have not been initialized (i.e. written to). To work around this issue, the first 8 bytes are initialized here.
Yes. Also put the current IP revision (3.0.x) into the comment. Did inform the Bosch guys from this issue - or is it already in some errata sheet?
quoted
+ * bytes (whatever value for the second word) in Message RAM to + * avoid bit error for transmit data less than 4 bytes at the first + * time. By initializing the first 8 bytes of tx buffer before using + * it can avoid such issue. + */ + m_can_fifo_write(priv, 0, M_CAN_FIFO_DATA(0), 0x0); + m_can_fifo_write(priv, 0, M_CAN_FIFO_DATA(1), 0x0); + m_can_config_endisable(priv, false); }Can you trigger the issue when sending CAN-FD frames with dlc > 8 && dlc < 64?
Just a nitpick: DLC can just be 0 .. 15 and the length (struct canfd_frame.len) can be from 0 .. 64 See: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/uapi/linux/can.h#L83 That's the reason for all these helpers http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/can/dev.c#L36 that hide the evil "DLC" from userspace now and make 'len' a usable loop variable as we were able to use the former dlc for classic CAN :-) Regards, Oliver