On 24.09.14 18:06:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

+               compatible = "cavium,thunder-pcie";
+               device_type = "pci";
+               msi-parent = <&its>;
+               bus-range = <0 255>;
+               #size-cells = <2>;
+               #address-cells = <3>;
+               reg = <0x8480 0x00000000 0 0x10000000>;  /* Configuration space */
+               ranges = <0x03000000 0x8010 0x00000000 0x8010 0x00000000 0x70 0x00000000>, /* mem ranges */
+                       <0x03000000 0x8300 0x00000000 0x8300 0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000>,
+                       <0x03000000 0x87e0 0x00000000 0x87e0 0x00000000 0x01 0x00000000>;
+        };

If you claim the entire 0-255 bus range, I think you should also
specify a domain, otherwise it's not predictable which domain you
get.

Liviu's code assigns a unique id to the domain if missing, see
of_pci_get_domain_nr(). So I don't think we need to add a "pci-domain"
property here.

Liviu's DT implementation that assigns a unique number differs a bit
from ACPI which states: "If _SEG [aka domain number] does not exist,
OSPM assumes that all PCI bus segments are in PCI Segment Group 0."

Maybe of_pci_get_domain_nr() should be similar to ACPI. If there are
multiple root bridges, the "pci-domain" property could be forced
instead.

-Robert