[PATCH v3 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi"
From: Jon Masters <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-09 22:16:11
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On 09/09/2014 01:17 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Hanjun Guo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Al Stone <redacted> Introduce one early parameters "off" for "acpi" to disable ACPI on ARM64.It might be worth mentioning the purpose of this in the changelog (and maybe the documentation). I don't think this parameter is supported on ia64, and on x86 it seems like it's mostly used as a "fix" by Ubuntu users who consider the problem resolved when they find this parameter. That just means we don't get a chance to fix the real underlying problem, so I'm not sure it's a real benefit to have the parameter.
quoted
- acpi= [HW,ACPI,X86] + acpi= [HW,ACPI,X86,ARM] Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Format: { force | off | strict | noirq | rsdt } force -- enable ACPI if default was off@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted. strictly ACPI specification compliant. rsdt -- prefer RSDT over (default) XSDT copy_dsdt -- copy DSDT to memory + For ARM64, ONLY "acpi=off" is available.
Something along the lines of: "The purpose of disabling ACPI on 64-bit ARM server platforms is to allow for an orderly adoption of ACPI on early systems that may also provide a DeviceTree based boot option initially. The acpi= option disables both parsing of any tables passed in through the EFI System Table RSDP and also disables the runtime ACPI interpreter on arm64". On our internal systems, we've both ACPI and DeviceTree working with a simple switch (acpi=) to determine the behavior, which is facilitating an orderly total migration to ACPI that is in currently in flight. Jon.