[PATCHv3 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk
From: Seungwon Jeon <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-10 12:43:08
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, linux-samsung-soc
On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 10 July 2014 13:53, Seungwon Jeon [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:quoted
On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, Ulf. On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:quoted
On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks. (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.) Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>Hi Jaehoon, I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys. Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and 5.[PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc [PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmcquoted
[PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk 2nd and 4th are closely related 5th. I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch? And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix. (Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.) Kukjin, Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's?I tried applied the complete patchset for 3.16 rc4, but some of the DTS patches fails. What are these patches based upon?
I guess it's based on Ulf or Chris? It may need to be rebased for 3.16 rc4.
I wonder if it's not best to leave all these for Kukjin to handle instead. You have my ack for all of the mmc patches!
Thanks, Seungwon Jeon