Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 5 authors, 2014-07-10

[PATCHv3 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

From: Seungwon Jeon <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-10 11:53:23
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, linux-samsung-soc

On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi, Ulf.

On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted
On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
(Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)

Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Hi Jaehoon,

I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share
them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys.
Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.
Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc
patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other
words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and
5.
[PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

2nd and 4th are closely related 5th.
I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch?
And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix.
(Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.)

Kukjin,
Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's?

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help