[PATCHv3 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

On 10 July 2014 13:53, Seungwon Jeon [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:

quoted

On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi, Ulf.

On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:

quoted

On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
(Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)

Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>

Hi Jaehoon,

I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share
them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys.
Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.

Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc
patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other
words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and
5.

[PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

2nd and 4th are closely related 5th.
I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch?
And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix.
(Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.)

Kukjin,
Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's?

I tried applied the complete patchset for 3.16 rc4, but some of the
DTS patches fails. What are these patches based upon?

I wonder if it's not best to leave all these for Kukjin to handle
instead. You have my ack for all of the mmc patches!

Kind regards
Uffe