On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 19:05 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2014 06:40 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:23:16PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c
[]
quoted
quoted
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ struct crossbar_device {
uint *irq_map;
void __iomem *crossbar_base;
int *register_offsets;
- void (*write) (int, int);
+
+ void (*write)(int, int);
The empty line here looks bogus to me.
Good eye. It's unnecessary.
Did you re-run checkpatch after
quoted
fixing the unnecessary space to see if it still complained about having
a 'blank line after declarations'?
Yes, it still complains even after fixing unnecessary space.
It's a checkpatch defect.
It's been fixed by:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/6/426
quoted
I'm generally opposed to these sorts of checkpatch patches, especially
when they are just warnings. It's great for a new driver in the staging
tree, but it makes backporting future bugfixes that much harder when
drivers have been live in mainline.
Blind adherence to checkpatch isn't always a great idea.
But bugfix backports haven't been much of an issue in
other subsystems with fairly active whitespace/style
changes.