Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 9 authors, 2013-10-30

[PATCH v3 05/10] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for interrupt handling

From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-30 18:17:59
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

On 10/28, Josh Cartwright wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -108,12 +111,17 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev {
 	void __iomem		*base;
 	void __iomem		*intr;
 	void __iomem		*cnfg;
+	unsigned int		irq;
 	bool			allow_wakeup;
 	spinlock_t		lock;
 	u8			channel;
 	u8			min_apid;
 	u8			max_apid;
 	u32			mapping_table[SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_LEN];
+	int			bus_nr;
This looks unused.
+	struct irq_domain	*domain;
+	struct spmi_controller	*spmic;
+	u16			apid_to_ppid[256];
 };
 
 static inline u32 pmic_arb_base_read(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *dev, u32 offset)
[...]
+
+static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq);
+	void __iomem *intr = pa->intr;
+	int first = pa->min_apid >> 5;
+	int last = pa->max_apid >> 5;
+	int i, id;
+	u8 ee = 0; /*pa->owner;*/
TODO?
+	u32 status;
+
+	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
+
+	for (i = first; i <= last; ++i) {
+		status = readl_relaxed(intr + SPMI_PIC_OWNER_ACC_STATUS(ee, i));
+		while (status) {
+			id = ffs(status) - 1;
+			status &= ~(1 << id);
+			periph_interrupt(pa, id + i * 32);
+		}
+	}
+
+	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
+}
+
[...]
+static int qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
+					   struct device_node *controller,
+					   const u32 *intspec,
+					   unsigned int intsize,
+					   unsigned long *out_hwirq,
+					   unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+	struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa = d->host_data;
+	struct spmi_pmic_arb_irq_spec spec;
+	int err;
+	u8 apid;
+
+	dev_dbg(&pa->spmic->dev,
+		"intspec[0] 0x%1x intspec[1] 0x%02x intspec[2] 0x%02x\n",
+		intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2]);
+
+	if (d->of_node != controller)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (intsize != 4)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (intspec[0] > 0xF || intspec[1] > 0xFF || intspec[2] > 0x7)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	spec.slave = intspec[0];
+	spec.per   = intspec[1];
+	spec.irq   = intspec[2];
+
+	err = search_mapping_table(pa, &spec, &apid);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	pa->apid_to_ppid[apid] = spec.slave << 8 | spec.per;
+
+	/* Keep track of {max,min}_apid for bounding search during interrupt */
+	if (apid > pa->max_apid)
+		pa->max_apid = apid;
+	if (apid < pa->min_apid)
+		pa->min_apid = apid;
Ah makes sense now why we set this to the opposite values in
probe.  Please put a comment in patch 4 and maybe move that setup
in patch 4 to this patch.
+
+	*out_hwirq = spec.slave << 24
+		   | spec.per   << 16
+		   | spec.irq   << 8
+		   | apid;
+	*out_type  = intspec[3] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
+
+	dev_dbg(&pa->spmic->dev, "out_hwirq = %lu\n", *out_hwirq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa;
 	struct spmi_controller *ctrl;
 	struct resource *res;
-	int err, i;
+	int err = 0, i;
 
 	ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pa));
 	if (!ctrl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	pa = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+	pa->spmic = ctrl;
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "core");
 	pa->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res);
@@ -349,6 +679,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_put_ctrl;
 	}
 
+	pa->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (pa->irq < 0) {
+		err = pa->irq;
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pa->mapping_table); ++i)
 		pa->mapping_table[i] = readl_relaxed(
 				pa->cnfg + SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(i));
@@ -364,15 +700,30 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ctrl->read_cmd = pmic_arb_read_cmd;
 	ctrl->write_cmd = pmic_arb_write_cmd;
 
+	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain\n");
+	pa->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
+					 &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, pa);
+	if (!pa->domain) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
Why do we silently ignore the error here? Is the irqchip
functionality optional? Setting err here should allow us to skip
intializing err to 0 up at the top of this function.
+	}
+
+	irq_set_handler_data(pa->irq, pa);
+	irq_set_chained_handler(pa->irq, pmic_arb_chained_irq);
+
 	err = spmi_controller_add(ctrl);
 	if (err)
-		goto err_put_ctrl;
+		goto err_domain_remove;
 
 	dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "PMIC Arb Version 0x%x\n",
 		pmic_arb_base_read(pa, PMIC_ARB_VERSION));
 
 	return 0;
 
+err_domain_remove:
+	irq_set_chained_handler(pa->irq, NULL);
+	irq_set_handler_data(pa->irq, NULL);
+	irq_domain_remove(pa->domain);
 err_put_ctrl:
 	spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
 	return err;
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help