Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 9 authors, 2013-10-30

[PATCH v3 02/10] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI

From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen)
Date: 2013-10-29 15:21:40
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

Couple of high-level comments on the in-kernel API.

On 10/28/2013 07:12 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int spmi_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
+
+	if (pm)
+		return pm_generic_suspend(dev);
pm_generic_suspend() checks both dev->driver and dev->driver->pm and returns
0 if either of them is NULL, so there should be no need to wrap the function.
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+
+static int spmi_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
+
+	if (pm)
+		return pm_generic_resume(dev);
Same here
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+#else
+#define spmi_pm_suspend		NULL
+#define spmi_pm_resume		NULL
+#endif
[...]
+/**
+ * spmi_controller_remove: Controller tear-down.
+ * @ctrl: controller to be removed.
+ *
+ * Controller added with the above API is torn down using this API.
+ */
+int spmi_controller_remove(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
The return type should be void. The function can't fail and nobody is going
to check the return value anyway.
+{
+	int dummy;
+
+	if (!ctrl)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dummy = device_for_each_child(&ctrl->dev, NULL,
+				      spmi_ctrl_remove_device);
+	device_unregister(&ctrl->dev);
Should be device_del(). device_unregister() will do both device_del() and
put_device(). But usually you'd want to do something in between like release
resources used by the controller.
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_controller_remove);
+
[...]
+/**
+ * spmi_controller_alloc: Allocate a new SPMI controller
+ * @ctrl: associated controller
+ *
+ * Caller is responsible for either calling spmi_device_add() to add the
+ * newly allocated controller, or calling spmi_device_put() to discard it.
+ */
+struct spmi_device *spmi_device_alloc(struct spmi_controller *ctrl);
+
+static inline void spmi_device_put(struct spmi_device *sdev)
For symmetry reasons it might make sense to call this spmi_device_free().
+{
+	if (sdev)
+		put_device(&sdev->dev);
+}
[...]
+#define to_spmi_controller(d) container_of(d, struct spmi_controller, dev)
Should be a inline function for better type safety.

[...]
+static inline void spmi_controller_put(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
For symmetry reasons it might make sense to call this spmi_controller_free().
+{
+	if (ctrl)
+		put_device(&ctrl->dev);
+}
+
[....]
+struct spmi_driver {
+	struct device_driver driver;
+	int	(*probe)(struct spmi_device *sdev);
+	int	(*remove)(struct spmi_device *sdev);
The type of the remove function should be found. The Linux device model
doesn't really allow for device removal to fail.
+	void	(*shutdown)(struct spmi_device *sdev);
+	int	(*suspend)(struct spmi_device *sdev, pm_message_t pmesg);
+	int	(*resume)(struct spmi_device *sdev);
The framework seems to support dev_pm_ops just fine, there should be no need
for legacy suspend/resume callbacks.
+};
+#define to_spmi_driver(d) container_of(d, struct spmi_driver, driver)
Inline function here as well
[...]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help