On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:06:45AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:

On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

+
+Optional properties:
+- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and
+  "l2_irq"

As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names was
present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of no
value.

Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't
adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel.

That's also fine given that this is a very specific binding.

Mark.