Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 6 authors, 2013-10-30

[PATCH 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-29 08:21:14
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml

On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
interrupt for the L2 cache.

Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..01fe8a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+* Qualcomm Krait L1 / L2 cache error reporting
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Should be "qcom,krait-cache-erp"
+- interrupts: Should contain the L1/CPU error interrupt number and
+  then the L2 cache error interrupt number
+
+Optional properties:
+- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and
+  "l2_irq"
+
+Example:
+	edac {
+		compatible = "qcom,krait-cache-erp";
+		interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>, <0 2 0x4>;
+	};
Why wouldn't we have these as part of cache nodes in the dts?  (which begs the question why we don't have cache nodes?)

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help