[PATCH 211/228] cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
From: Vladimir Murzin <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-14 07:42:35
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 09:39:31AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 14 September 2013 04:22, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I wonder if this series is bisectable? Perhaps I should just go and read the rest of the series, but I presume there's a patch somewhere else that adds those two cpufreq_notify_transition() to the cpufreq core. Either that happens before this patch (in which case listeners will get two notifications each time; perhaps that is safe?), or after this patch (in which case with just this patch applied, no notifications will be sent until a later patch!Hmm.. Good Catch.. So, yes git bisect would be compilable but not runnable.. As we are already serialized notifications and so two PRE notifications will generate a crash.. But I don't want to get all that in a single patch as that would be: 40 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 623 deletions(-) And that would be hard to review it.. Any suggestions?
It reminds me time of removing CONFIG_HOTPLUG and following __dev* attributes. At least stats for 48c68c4 "Drivers: video: remove __dev* attributes" is: 135 files changed, 1017 insertions(+), 1129 deletions(-) Maybe coccinelle script, which maintainers could run it on their trees, would help? Vladimir
quoted
Aside from that, all the Tegra-specific patches in this series, Acked-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>Thanks.. _______________________________________________ linaro-kernel mailing list linaro-kernel at lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel