Thread (270 messages) flat view 270 messages, 11 authors, 2013-10-04

[PATCH 211/228] cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

From: Vladimir Murzin <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-14 07:42:35
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 09:39:31AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 14 September 2013 04:22, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I wonder if this series is bisectable? Perhaps I should just go and read
the rest of the series, but I presume there's a patch somewhere else
that adds those two cpufreq_notify_transition() to the cpufreq core.
Either that happens before this patch (in which case listeners will get
two notifications each time; perhaps that is safe?), or after this patch
(in which case with just this patch applied, no notifications will be
sent until a later patch!
Hmm.. Good Catch..

So, yes git bisect would be compilable but not runnable.. As we are
already serialized notifications and so two PRE notifications will
generate a crash..

But I don't want to get all that in a single patch as that would be:

 40 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 623 deletions(-)

And that would be hard to review it..

Any suggestions?
It reminds me time of removing CONFIG_HOTPLUG and following __dev* attributes.
At least stats for 48c68c4 "Drivers: video: remove __dev* attributes" is:

135 files changed, 1017 insertions(+), 1129 deletions(-)

Maybe coccinelle script, which maintainers could run it on their trees, would
help?

Vladimir
quoted
Aside from that, all the Tegra-specific patches in this series,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
Thanks..

_______________________________________________
linaro-kernel mailing list
linaro-kernel at lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help