[Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2013-08-01 10:10:16
Also in:
lkml
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2013-08-01 10:10:16
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 11:57:43AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/31/2013 11:26 PM, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote:
quoted
Alternatively you may be of the belief that it is impossible to get rid of the board specific code. But x86 doesn't have any of it, why should ARM?
Well, I am curious whether that will stay that way once x86 is truly moving into the embedded arena (if ever).
There's shipping phones using x86, they do actually have board code due to their use of SFI. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130801/b3df6834/attachment.sig>