DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
From: richardcochran@gmail.com (Richard Cochran)
Date: 2013-07-27 08:53:22
Also in:
lkml
From: richardcochran@gmail.com (Richard Cochran)
Date: 2013-07-27 08:53:22
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:15:24AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:54:33AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:quoted
I too work on commercial embedded systems, and DT has proven to be one gigantic *PITA*.Why do you think our experiences are so different?
Here are a few recent examples: * What happens when one wants to boot vanilla kernel on the beaglebone? http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg198431.html * Wanting already merged code to work is too much to ask. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg79731.html * When people try in good faith to conduct methodical boot tests, DT is working against them. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg79960.html Thanks, Richard