[Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2013-07-26 14:11:03
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
Unless I totally misunderstood, the thread is talking about letting established bindings change with each new kernel version. I am opposed to that.
No, nobody is really saying that is a particularly good idea. There is some debate about how we work out what an established binding is but there's no serious suggestion that we don't want stable bindings. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130726/b4884404/attachment.sig>