Thread (61 messages) 61 messages, 20 authors, 2013-05-31

[PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init unconditionally

From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
Date: 2013-05-09 03:39:12
Also in: lkml

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:22:22PM +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
Hi,

2013/5/8 Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Thursday 02 May 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
@@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void)

 void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void)
 {
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
+               return;
+
        irqchip_init();
Why not have an empty irqchip_init? I'd guess we'll need this on other
platforms and your default mach.
Thanks, I think that could work.

I will see about making it so.
Ping
I have sent out a patch adding an empty irqchip_init() when
CONFIG_IRQCHIP is not set with the subject
[PATCH] irqchip: Add irqchip_init dummy function
Thanks.
quoted
Linux-next is still broken for me. There is also anothe shmobile build bug,
I'll send a separate patch for that, which also needs to go into your tree.
Sorry about that. I though I had pushed your fix (the first hunk of the
patch that started this thread), but it seems that I did not.
Oh thanks Arnd for this fix!

Cheers,

 Bastian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help