[PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init unconditionally
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
Date: 2013-05-09 03:39:12
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:22:22PM +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
Hi, 2013/5/8 Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref]:quoted
On Thursday 02 May 2013, Simon Horman wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c@@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void) void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void) { + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) + return; + irqchip_init();Why not have an empty irqchip_init? I'd guess we'll need this on other platforms and your default mach.Thanks, I think that could work. I will see about making it so.PingI have sent out a patch adding an empty irqchip_init() when CONFIG_IRQCHIP is not set with the subject [PATCH] irqchip: Add irqchip_init dummy function
Thanks.
quoted
Linux-next is still broken for me. There is also anothe shmobile build bug, I'll send a separate patch for that, which also needs to go into your tree.
Sorry about that. I though I had pushed your fix (the first hunk of the patch that started this thread), but it seems that I did not.
Oh thanks Arnd for this fix! Cheers, Bastian