Thread (48 messages) flat view 48 messages, 7 authors, 2017-01-02

[PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-22 22:31:53
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:54:24PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
quoted
Quoting Viresh Kumar (2012-11-20 02:13:55)
quoted
On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
We'll need to invoke clk_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_*
conversion so let's uninline the pair.
Sorry, but you aren't doing this :(
This routine is already uninlined as it is in clk.c

Instead you are just moving clk_prepare(), etc calls within
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
#else
#endif

I doubt why they have been added under #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
earlier. Can they exist without CONFIG_HAVE_CLK

@Mike: ?
HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE.  There is no point in
selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.

Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case.  Commit
93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK.  That
commit was authored by you.  Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
patch was needed?
BTW, it looks like the only place where we select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is
IMX platform and it also selects COMMON_CLK so I think HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
can be removed now.
You've checked non-ARM architectures too?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help