On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Viresh Kumar (2012-11-20 02:13:55)
quoted
On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
We'll need to invoke clk_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_*
conversion so let's uninline the pair.
Sorry, but you aren't doing this :(
This routine is already uninlined as it is in clk.c
Instead you are just moving clk_prepare(), etc calls within
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
#else
#endif
I doubt why they have been added under #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
earlier. Can they exist without CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
@Mike: ?
HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE. There is no point in
selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.
Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case. Commit
93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. That
commit was authored by you. Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
patch was needed?
BTW, it looks like the only place where we select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is
IMX platform and it also selects COMMON_CLK so I think HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
can be removed now.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry