On 22 November 2012 02:13, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:
HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE. There is no point in
selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.
Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case. Commit
93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. That
commit was authored by you. Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
patch was needed?
Haha... Caught red handed :(
Before this commit, nothing was enclosed within CONFIG_HAVE_CLK and
this patch only introduced it. I am not really sure, why i kept
prepare/unprepare
out of it though :(
Maybe because some platform at that time is using it directly, without
CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. Not sure.
--
viresh