[PATCH 10/10] ARM: msm: Migrate to common clock framework
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-26 18:50:51
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On 09/26/12 11:47, Pankaj Jangra wrote:
Hi Stephen, On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
-static int pc_clk_set_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate) +static int pc_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long new_rate, + unsigned long p_rate) { - /* The rate _might_ be rounded off to the nearest KHz value by the + struct clk_pcom *p = to_clk_pcom(hw); + unsigned id = p->id, rate = new_rate; + int rc; + + /* + * The rate _might_ be rounded off to the nearest KHz value by the * remote function. So a return value of 0 doesn't necessarily mean * that the exact rate was set successfully. */ - int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_SET_RATE, &id, &rate); - if (rc < 0) - return rc; - else - return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0; -} - -static int pc_clk_set_min_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate) -{ - int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MIN_RATE, &id, &rate); - if (rc < 0) - return rc; + if (p->flags & CLKFLAG_MIN) + rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MIN_RATE, &id, &rate);You are missing if condition here checking the rc ?quoted
else - return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0; -} - -static int pc_clk_set_max_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate) -{ - int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MAX_RATE, &id, &rate);and else here i think for the MIN_FLAG if check.quoted
+ rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_SET_RATE, &id, &rate); if (rc < 0) return rc; else return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0; }
This is the resulting code:
if (p->flags & CLKFLAG_MIN)
rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MIN_RATE, &id, &rate);
else
rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_SET_RATE, &id, &rate);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
else
return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
So we check the rc for both cases in the same if condition. Is there
anything wrong?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation