[PATCH 10/10] ARM: msm: Migrate to common clock framework
From: Pankaj Jangra <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-26 18:47:58
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi Stephen, On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:
-static int pc_clk_set_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
+static int pc_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long new_rate,
+ unsigned long p_rate)
{
- /* The rate _might_ be rounded off to the nearest KHz value by the
+ struct clk_pcom *p = to_clk_pcom(hw);
+ unsigned id = p->id, rate = new_rate;
+ int rc;
+
+ /*
+ * The rate _might_ be rounded off to the nearest KHz value by the
* remote function. So a return value of 0 doesn't necessarily mean
* that the exact rate was set successfully.
*/
- int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_SET_RATE, &id, &rate);
- if (rc < 0)
- return rc;
- else
- return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
-}
-
-static int pc_clk_set_min_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
-{
- int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MIN_RATE, &id, &rate);
- if (rc < 0)
- return rc;
+ if (p->flags & CLKFLAG_MIN)
+ rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MIN_RATE, &id, &rate);You are missing if condition here checking the rc ?
else
- return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
-}
-
-static int pc_clk_set_max_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
-{
- int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MAX_RATE, &id, &rate);and else here i think for the MIN_FLAG if check.
+ rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_SET_RATE, &id, &rate);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
else
return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
}-- Pankaj Jangra