On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I'll take this series into clk-next.

Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3.  Which tree do you want that to
go through?

Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts.
Acked-by etc.

Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least
let's try it out.
I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later
on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.

That will probably hit the next merge window anyway - these
patches will go into v3.7 as it looks, then you can finalize the
next series for v3.8.

Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd?
"mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock"

Confused, isn't that patch part of the latter series, and not
part of what Mike merged?

Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that
specific mfd file I have patched?

That's up to Mike, but I hardly think Sam is going to get very
angry about this if we merge it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij