On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I'll take this series into clk-next.

Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3.  Which tree do you want that to
go through?

Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts.
Acked-by etc.

Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least
let's try it out.
I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later
on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.

Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd?
"mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock"

Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that
specific mfd file I have patched?

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson