On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:37:47AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

The bit I was saying was most low risk was the actual DT changes, as
opposed to the bits that parse and use the DT.

Ah, O.K. I understood you wrongly. I actually think they are the most
dangerous part. A board booting with these DT changes, and without the
driver enablement for DT is likely to fail to find its root
filesystem.

Why would that be?  If there's no DT support for the driver it'll just
ignore the DT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120723/ef1f9e24/attachment-0001.sig>