On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:27:49AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:

Will you accept any patches for this merge window? As you said, the DT
enablement is low risk. It should be possible to separate this one
patch from the other two.

Can you send the patches please?

The bit I was saying was most low risk was the actual DT changes, as
opposed to the bits that parse and use the DT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120723/7bfedb4b/attachment.sig>