* Hiremath, Vaibhav [off-list ref] [120710 01:35]:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 13:48:52, Tony Lindgren wrote:

quoted

No thanks.. We don't want to make it 32 bit and bloat all the compiled in
clock even further. 

In that case, how about just get rid of cpu_mask completely and trust the 
data passed by clock-tree for clksel dividers?
Let clock-tree data handle this, even if in some cases we end up in 
duplicating data for some clocks??

Yes something like that. We already know which clocks need to
be registered, so whatever we still use CK_XXXX for should be also
initialized in omapxxxx_clk_init() functions.

Regards,

Tony