[PATCH v2 02/14] ARM: OMAP: counter-32k: Select the CR register offset using the IP scheme.
From: Hiremath, Vaibhav <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-10 07:25:07
Also in:
linux-omap
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:42:46, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 16:12:15, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 7/6/2012 2:51 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:quoted
From: R Sricharan <redacted> OMAP socs has a legacy and a highlander version of the 32k sync counter IP. The register offsets vary between the highlander and the legacy scheme. So use the 'SCHEME' bits(30-31) of the revision register to distinguish betweenJust for my understanding, can we get further information on SCHEME bit-fields? What kind of information we have it here. I may need this info to pass on to design team here.Sure. You can refer to the OMAP4 TRM for the bit builds. SCHEME bit field tell you difference between a highlander and legacy IP as the patch says.Santosh, Can you point to the section of OMAP4 TRM? I referred to both Public TRM and internal TRM, but both only did mention "TI internal Data".Last time I refereed the internal TRM version. Public TRM doesn't carry that information for some reason.quoted
And as per code, we are not checking any value in 31-30 bit-fields, code just assumes that, non-zero value would be highlander IP.There are only two types of IP's today and hence it will be either 0x0 or 0x1. So that check if just fine. The highlander IP may have more versions but for known OMAPs and upcoming OMAP, this is the only one supported version. Some more information on the SCHEME bit field. ----------------- 31:30 SCHEME Used to distinguish between old scheme and current. RO Read Only 0x0 - LEGACY 0x1 - Highlander 0.8 scheme --------------------------------
Thanks Santosh, This is what I was looking for, may be it is worth to put this information in either commit description of in code-comment. Thanks, Vaibhav