Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 6 authors, 2012-07-02
STALE5080d
Revisions (15)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v2 [diff vs current]
  4. v2 [diff vs current]
  5. v2 [diff vs current]
  6. v2 [diff vs current]
  7. v2 [diff vs current]
  8. v2 [diff vs current]
  9. v2 [diff vs current]
  10. v2 current
  11. v2 [diff vs current]
  12. v2 [diff vs current]
  13. v2 [diff vs current]
  14. v2 [diff vs current]
  15. v2 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v2 2/2] net: flexcan: add transceiver switch gpios support

From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde)
Date: 2012-06-28 11:29:19
Also in: linux-can

On 06/28/2012 01:21 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
Hmm I'm wondering if transceiver or phy is the correct name here. In
platform_data it's called transceiver_switch.
The transceiver_switch in platform_data names a function, while we are
naming a couple gpios which happen to be access in that function.  It
looks all correct to me.
I mean which name is more precise, do these gpio enable/standy a "phy"
or a "transceiver". For example:
http://www.nxp.com/documents/application_note/AN00094.pdf, this document
says: TJA1041/1041A high speed CAN transceiver.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120628/75c661b1/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help