[PATCH v5 3/4] clk: introduce the common clock framework
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-09 00:52:04
Also in:
lkml
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-09 00:52:04
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Turquette, Mike wrote:
Assuming that some day OMAP code can be refactored to allow for lazy (or at least initcall-based) registration of clocks then perhaps your suggestion can take root. Which leads me to this question: are there any other platforms out there that require the level of expose to struct clk present in this patchset? OMAP does, for now, but if that changes then I need to know if others require this as well.
I can't see the problem, really. Other than existing code doing stuff before the memory allocator is up and running. We allocate interrupt data structures in the early boot process today and I don't see a reason why you want clocks, which have not been configured by the boot loader, accesible before that point. Thanks, tglx